<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1576 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465918</link>
    <description>Application for condonation of delay addressed the sufficiency of cause for a 1707-day delay; absence of cogent explanation and admission of failure to receive counsels message amounted to negligence and lack of due diligence, negating sufficient cause and supporting exercise of judicial discretion against grant. The consequence is dismissal of the condonation application and refusal to excuse the delay, reflecting that inordinate unexplained delay and want of diligence defeat relief under limitation principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1576 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465918</link>
      <description>Application for condonation of delay addressed the sufficiency of cause for a 1707-day delay; absence of cogent explanation and admission of failure to receive counsels message amounted to negligence and lack of due diligence, negating sufficient cause and supporting exercise of judicial discretion against grant. The consequence is dismissal of the condonation application and refusal to excuse the delay, reflecting that inordinate unexplained delay and want of diligence defeat relief under limitation principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>