<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1518 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465921</link>
    <description>Grant of regular bail where allegations against an applicant are substantially similar to co-accused requires parity in treatment; unexplained divergent bail orders amount to inconsistent exercise of judicial discretion, and equivalent treatment should be afforded. The principle of consistent reasoning in bail decisions is affirmed, resulting in direction for release on bail to the satisfaction of the trial court where co-accused on similar allegations have been granted bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:59:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1518 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465921</link>
      <description>Grant of regular bail where allegations against an applicant are substantially similar to co-accused requires parity in treatment; unexplained divergent bail orders amount to inconsistent exercise of judicial discretion, and equivalent treatment should be afforded. The principle of consistent reasoning in bail decisions is affirmed, resulting in direction for release on bail to the satisfaction of the trial court where co-accused on similar allegations have been granted bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>