<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49399</link>
    <description>Bonus shares issued by capitalisation of reserves and ranking pari passu with original shares are not treated as having a face-value or nil cost merely because no cash is paid on issue. The correct approach is to determine the real commercial and tax cost of the bonus shares by apportioning the original purchase price of the old shares over the original and bonus shares taken together, since the bonus issue diminishes the value of the original holding and the two holdings together represent the same capital interest. The face-value and nil-cost methods were rejected as inconsistent with business accounting principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49399</link>
      <description>Bonus shares issued by capitalisation of reserves and ranking pari passu with original shares are not treated as having a face-value or nil cost merely because no cash is paid on issue. The correct approach is to determine the real commercial and tax cost of the bonus shares by apportioning the original purchase price of the old shares over the original and bonus shares taken together, since the bonus issue diminishes the value of the original holding and the two holdings together represent the same capital interest. The face-value and nil-cost methods were rejected as inconsistent with business accounting principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>