<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Virtual-service permanent establishment without physical personnel under Article 5(2)(k)/5(6) denied; NIL-withholding order set aside, remanded</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96065</link>
    <description>The central issue was whether a &quot;virtual service permanent establishment&quot; exists under Article 5(2)(k)/5(6) of the DTAA where no personnel are physically present in India. Relying on treaty-construction principles and Clifford Chance, the court held the DTAA must be strictly construed; Article 5&#039;s phrase &quot;within a Contracting State&quot; carries territorial connotation and contemplates physical presence of employees/personnel. Consequently, a virtual service PE not expressly provided by the DTAA or domestic law cannot be recognised, the Revenue&#039;s finding was rejected, the impugned NIL-withholding certificate and order were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh decision within two weeks - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:13:23 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:13:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual-service permanent establishment without physical personnel under Article 5(2)(k)/5(6) denied; NIL-withholding order set aside, remanded</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96065</link>
      <description>The central issue was whether a &quot;virtual service permanent establishment&quot; exists under Article 5(2)(k)/5(6) of the DTAA where no personnel are physically present in India. Relying on treaty-construction principles and Clifford Chance, the court held the DTAA must be strictly construed; Article 5&#039;s phrase &quot;within a Contracting State&quot; carries territorial connotation and contemplates physical presence of employees/personnel. Consequently, a virtual service PE not expressly provided by the DTAA or domestic law cannot be recognised, the Revenue&#039;s finding was rejected, the impugned NIL-withholding certificate and order were set aside and the matter remanded to the AO for fresh decision within two weeks - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 18:13:23 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>