<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 1130 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465913</link>
    <description>Whether penal provisions for prohibited cash transactions apply where an agriculturist borrowed and repaid a cash loan through a cooperative society exempt under tax law and asserted lack of knowledge. The analysis applies the quasi-criminal standard for penalty proceedings, requiring deliberate, contumacious or dishonest conduct; absence of evidence of intention to evade tax, conceal income, or cause revenue loss negates imposition of penalty. The cooperative society exemption and repayment from agricultural income were treated as material to the enquiry, and the penalties under the relevant provisions were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 17:15:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 1130 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465913</link>
      <description>Whether penal provisions for prohibited cash transactions apply where an agriculturist borrowed and repaid a cash loan through a cooperative society exempt under tax law and asserted lack of knowledge. The analysis applies the quasi-criminal standard for penalty proceedings, requiring deliberate, contumacious or dishonest conduct; absence of evidence of intention to evade tax, conceal income, or cause revenue loss negates imposition of penalty. The cooperative society exemption and repayment from agricultural income were treated as material to the enquiry, and the penalties under the relevant provisions were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465913</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>