<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49386</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the order of the High Court in the writ petition and the decree in the suit. It concluded that the company was not entitled to rely on the agreement of April 7, 1947, for exemption from income-tax and super-tax, as the agreement had been superseded by subsequent legislative provisions. The court ordered that parties bear their own costs throughout.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 20 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49386</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals, setting aside the order of the High Court in the writ petition and the decree in the suit. It concluded that the company was not entitled to rely on the agreement of April 7, 1947, for exemption from income-tax and super-tax, as the agreement had been superseded by subsequent legislative provisions. The court ordered that parties bear their own costs throughout.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>