https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49385 The court found that the tax on pensioners was not lawfully levied prior to the Constitution's commencement, and therefore could not be continued under Article 277. The appellant succeeded in the appeal, obtaining a writ of prohibition against the Corporation of Madras from enforcing the demand for profession tax on his pension. The appellant was also awarded costs from the respondents. The appeal was allowed, granting the relief sought in the petition filed in the High Court. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 15:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49385 The court found that the tax on pensioners was not lawfully levied prior to the Constitution's commencement, and therefore could not be continued under Article 277. The appellant succeeded in the appeal, obtaining a writ of prohibition against the Corporation of Madras from enforcing the demand for profession tax on his pension. The appellant was also awarded costs from the respondents. The appeal was allowed, granting the relief sought in the petition filed in the High Court. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 03 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49385