<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (5) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49382</link>
    <description>Compensation linked to cancellation of an agency was treated as revenue because the termination did not impair the trading structure or destroy the source of income; it merely removed one trading avenue in the ordinary course of business. The agency was only one among several lines of business, was terminable at will, and the payment was calculated by reference to expected commission and profits during the transition period. No part of the amount was shown to be attributable to a restrictive covenant or loss of goodwill, as there was no enforceable non-compete undertaking or supporting material. The receipt was therefore assessable as income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (5) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49382</link>
      <description>Compensation linked to cancellation of an agency was treated as revenue because the termination did not impair the trading structure or destroy the source of income; it merely removed one trading avenue in the ordinary course of business. The agency was only one among several lines of business, was terminable at will, and the payment was calculated by reference to expected commission and profits during the transition period. No part of the amount was shown to be attributable to a restrictive covenant or loss of goodwill, as there was no enforceable non-compete undertaking or supporting material. The receipt was therefore assessable as income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>