https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784960 Money laundering allegations concerning ketamine and frozen assets were assessed on the preponderance of probabilities, with the available material treated as sufficient to infer involvement in money laundering and to justify continued retention and freezing of properties under the challenged regime; the decision distinguishes a prior Supreme Court precedent as factually and legally inapplicable and notes the appellant failed to discharge the onus of rebutting involvement, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784960 Money laundering allegations concerning ketamine and frozen assets were assessed on the preponderance of probabilities, with the available material treated as sufficient to infer involvement in money laundering and to justify continued retention and freezing of properties under the challenged regime; the decision distinguishes a prior Supreme Court precedent as factually and legally inapplicable and notes the appellant failed to discharge the onus of rebutting involvement, resulting in dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784960