<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 722 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784966</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted where the prosecution case rested largely on stereotyped statements of rice millers and co-accused, with no contemporaneous record linking the applicant to the alleged policy decision or financial benefit. The Court treated the co-accused statements as only corroborative, noted that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and accepted that absence of prosecution sanction would delay cognizance and trial. It also relied on the applicant&#039;s custody having become prolonged without any demonstrated risk of flight, tampering, or witness influence, and on parity with co-accused already on bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 722 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784966</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted where the prosecution case rested largely on stereotyped statements of rice millers and co-accused, with no contemporaneous record linking the applicant to the alleged policy decision or financial benefit. The Court treated the co-accused statements as only corroborative, noted that custodial interrogation was not shown to be necessary, and accepted that absence of prosecution sanction would delay cognizance and trial. It also relied on the applicant&#039;s custody having become prolonged without any demonstrated risk of flight, tampering, or witness influence, and on parity with co-accused already on bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>