<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784974</link>
    <description>Whether the departmental deposit constituted a pre-deposit attracting statutory interest: applying the post-2014 amendment to Section 35F/35FF and Central Government Circular No. 984/8/2014-CX (and the principle under Section 129EE of the Customs Act), the deposited amount is treated as a pre-deposit and the appellant is entitled to interest thereon; consequence - refund of the deposit with interest at the government-fixed rate of 6% per annum from date of deposit until disbursement. Whether the refund application date governs entitlement: under Section 11B(2) the subsequently filed claim (27.10.2023) relates back to the original claim dated 21.03.2018 and was wrongly treated as the original; consequence - impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 730 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784974</link>
      <description>Whether the departmental deposit constituted a pre-deposit attracting statutory interest: applying the post-2014 amendment to Section 35F/35FF and Central Government Circular No. 984/8/2014-CX (and the principle under Section 129EE of the Customs Act), the deposited amount is treated as a pre-deposit and the appellant is entitled to interest thereon; consequence - refund of the deposit with interest at the government-fixed rate of 6% per annum from date of deposit until disbursement. Whether the refund application date governs entitlement: under Section 11B(2) the subsequently filed claim (27.10.2023) relates back to the original claim dated 21.03.2018 and was wrongly treated as the original; consequence - impugned order set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>