<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 736 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784980</link>
    <description>Whether the transfers constituted a benami transaction: AT found the requisite indicia of benami (lack of genuine consideration and control by the real payor) were satisfied because the purported loan/consideration originated from the payor-group, funds were rotated among related entities, and the nominee remained under the dominion of a director introduced by the payor to secure control and comply with EMC shareholding conditions; asserted loan repayment was a sham and no effective third-party repayment occurred. Outcome: the transaction was held benami and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 736 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784980</link>
      <description>Whether the transfers constituted a benami transaction: AT found the requisite indicia of benami (lack of genuine consideration and control by the real payor) were satisfied because the purported loan/consideration originated from the payor-group, funds were rotated among related entities, and the nominee remained under the dominion of a director introduced by the payor to secure control and comply with EMC shareholding conditions; asserted loan repayment was a sham and no effective third-party repayment occurred. Outcome: the transaction was held benami and the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>