<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49370</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;income-tax&quot; in rule 2(2)(c) of the compensation schedule does not include super-tax. Because the rule required deduction only of tax paid in respect of income from a specified source, and super-tax was a separate levy on total income, it could not be allocated to that source for compensation computation. In an expropriatory scheme, the statutory language was applied according to its natural meaning, and the absence of any reference to super-tax showed that only income-tax was deductible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49370</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;income-tax&quot; in rule 2(2)(c) of the compensation schedule does not include super-tax. Because the rule required deduction only of tax paid in respect of income from a specified source, and super-tax was a separate levy on total income, it could not be allocated to that source for compensation computation. In an expropriatory scheme, the statutory language was applied according to its natural meaning, and the absence of any reference to super-tax showed that only income-tax was deductible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>