<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 764 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785008</link>
    <description>Whether respondent violated Section 171 CGST by not passing on GST rate reduction: Section 171 imposes an affirmative obligation to pass tax-rate reductions by way of commensurate reduction in prices; compliance with State cinema regulatory ceilings is a procedural constraint and does not excuse non-passing. Outcome: contravention established and profiteering quantified at Rs. 11,88,482/-. Whether GST remitted to Government can be excluded from profiteered amount: the statutory scheme requires reduction in the all-inclusive price to benefit the consumer; remittance of GST to the exchequer does not negate consumer detriment. Outcome: GST component is included in the profiteered amount. Interest and penalty: interest under Rule 133(3)(c) is prospective from 28.06.2019 and was prorated for three days but waived in exercise of discretion; Section 171(3A) penalty not imposable as it came into force after the violation period. Outcome: interest waived; no penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 764 - GSTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785008</link>
      <description>Whether respondent violated Section 171 CGST by not passing on GST rate reduction: Section 171 imposes an affirmative obligation to pass tax-rate reductions by way of commensurate reduction in prices; compliance with State cinema regulatory ceilings is a procedural constraint and does not excuse non-passing. Outcome: contravention established and profiteering quantified at Rs. 11,88,482/-. Whether GST remitted to Government can be excluded from profiteered amount: the statutory scheme requires reduction in the all-inclusive price to benefit the consumer; remittance of GST to the exchequer does not negate consumer detriment. Outcome: GST component is included in the profiteered amount. Interest and penalty: interest under Rule 133(3)(c) is prospective from 28.06.2019 and was prorated for three days but waived in exercise of discretion; Section 171(3A) penalty not imposable as it came into force after the violation period. Outcome: interest waived; no penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>