<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 769 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785013</link>
    <description>Whether a writ is maintainable where a statutory appellate forum exists but was non-functional: HC applied the principle that writ relief is permissible only if the statutory forum is non-functional or inaccessible; conversely, where the forum is constituted and functional, the writ court must insist on strict compliance with statutory pre-conditions to appeal. Reasoning: statutory availability of GSTAT and statutory conditions (including pre-deposit under s.112(8) GST Act) govern remedy. Outcome: writ petition disposed; petitioner directed to make the required deposit under s.112(8) and pursue appeal before GSTAT within the prescribed extended timeline.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 08:41:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 769 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785013</link>
      <description>Whether a writ is maintainable where a statutory appellate forum exists but was non-functional: HC applied the principle that writ relief is permissible only if the statutory forum is non-functional or inaccessible; conversely, where the forum is constituted and functional, the writ court must insist on strict compliance with statutory pre-conditions to appeal. Reasoning: statutory availability of GSTAT and statutory conditions (including pre-deposit under s.112(8) GST Act) govern remedy. Outcome: writ petition disposed; petitioner directed to make the required deposit under s.112(8) and pursue appeal before GSTAT within the prescribed extended timeline.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=785013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>