<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49368</link>
    <description>The court held that the estate duty paid by the respondent was not an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeals were allowed with costs. It was determined that the estate duty paid by the company on behalf of non-domiciled shareholders is not deductible from its profits for the purpose of computing its assessable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49368</link>
      <description>The court held that the estate duty paid by the respondent was not an allowable deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act. The High Court&#039;s decision was overturned, and the appeals were allowed with costs. It was determined that the estate duty paid by the company on behalf of non-domiciled shareholders is not deductible from its profits for the purpose of computing its assessable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>