https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900 Whether the order terminating arbitral proceedings fell within Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: the SC held the termination could only be characterised as subclause (c) - continuation became impossible - and therefore Section 32(3) caused the arbitral tribunal's mandate to cease. Legal basis: cumulative reading of Sections 32 and 14, permitting judicial examination of whether the mandate stood legally terminated "as provided under Section 14(2)". Outcome: the appeal was dismissed; claimants remain free to approach the appropriate court to challenge the legality of the tribunal's termination. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900 Whether the order terminating arbitral proceedings fell within Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: the SC held the termination could only be characterised as subclause (c) - continuation became impossible - and therefore Section 32(3) caused the arbitral tribunal's mandate to cease. Legal basis: cumulative reading of Sections 32 and 14, permitting judicial examination of whether the mandate stood legally terminated "as provided under Section 14(2)". Outcome: the appeal was dismissed; claimants remain free to approach the appropriate court to challenge the legality of the tribunal's termination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900