https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, a challenge to the legality of an arbitral tribunal's termination of proceedings after it concludes that continuation is impossible lies before the competent court under Section 14(2), because Section 32 ends the tribunal's mandate when proceedings are terminated. Section 11 is confined to appointment of arbitrators and is not the proper route to question such termination. The statutory scheme therefore separates appointment, mandate termination, and termination of proceedings, and disputes over the latter must be examined by the court empowered under the Act. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:28:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900 Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, a challenge to the legality of an arbitral tribunal's termination of proceedings after it concludes that continuation is impossible lies before the competent court under Section 14(2), because Section 32 ends the tribunal's mandate when proceedings are terminated. Section 11 is confined to appointment of arbitrators and is not the proper route to question such termination. The statutory scheme therefore separates appointment, mandate termination, and termination of proceedings, and disputes over the latter must be examined by the court empowered under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465900