<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49360</link>
    <description>Whether collections labelled as empty-bottle return security deposits are income was resolved by treating them as part of the sale consideration and thus trading receipts assessable under section 10. The earlier ruling that such sums formed part of the price because they were demanded as a condition of sale was applied. The High Court distinctions - statutory sanction, asserted right of return, and rule-based collection - were rejected: statutory authorisation did not alter the contractual character, no enforceable consumer or retailer right of return was created, and the rule merely authorised deposit contracts without displacing the contractual source. Outcome: assessable as trading receipts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 10 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49360</link>
      <description>Whether collections labelled as empty-bottle return security deposits are income was resolved by treating them as part of the sale consideration and thus trading receipts assessable under section 10. The earlier ruling that such sums formed part of the price because they were demanded as a condition of sale was applied. The High Court distinctions - statutory sanction, asserted right of return, and rule-based collection - were rejected: statutory authorisation did not alter the contractual character, no enforceable consumer or retailer right of return was created, and the rule merely authorised deposit contracts without displacing the contractual source. Outcome: assessable as trading receipts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>