<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>&#039;Jana Nayagan&#039;: SC to hear on Jan 15 plea filed by film&#039;s producer challenging Madras HC order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67340</link>
    <description>The producer appealed the Madras High Court division bench&#039;s interim stay of a single-judge order that had directed the Central Board of Film Certification to immediately grant certification for Jana Nayagan, while the division bench held that the CBFC had not been given sufficient opportunity to file a reply and stayed the single-judge direction pending further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:31:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>&#039;Jana Nayagan&#039;: SC to hear on Jan 15 plea filed by film&#039;s producer challenging Madras HC order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67340</link>
      <description>The producer appealed the Madras High Court division bench&#039;s interim stay of a single-judge order that had directed the Central Board of Film Certification to immediately grant certification for Jana Nayagan, while the division bench held that the CBFC had not been given sufficient opportunity to file a reply and stayed the single-judge direction pending further hearing.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:31:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=67340</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>