https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465894 Whether an interim stay should suspend a retirement order where an employee claims entitlement to a higher retiring age as a "teacher." The HC held that ordinarily stay will not be granted merely on a prima facie case; balance of convenience and irreparable injury must favor the applicant. Reliance on Fundamental Rule 56 (normal superannuation at 58) and policy considerations preventing blocking promotions weighed against interim relief; exceptional cases (e.g., clear statutory conflict or binding SC decision) alone justify stay. Result: interim stay refused and application dismissed; retirement order reinstated. en-us Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:27:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465894 Whether an interim stay should suspend a retirement order where an employee claims entitlement to a higher retiring age as a "teacher." The HC held that ordinarily stay will not be granted merely on a prima facie case; balance of convenience and irreparable injury must favor the applicant. Reliance on Fundamental Rule 56 (normal superannuation at 58) and policy considerations preventing blocking promotions weighed against interim relief; exceptional cases (e.g., clear statutory conflict or binding SC decision) alone justify stay. Result: interim stay refused and application dismissed; retirement order reinstated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465894