<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465891</link>
    <description>Interim injunction law and equitable discretion govern requests to restore management and possession of school premises; applicants must show a prima facie case, balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable injury, and exercise utmost good faith. Suppression or misrepresentation of material facts and use of police to effect possession are relevant to discretion, and long uninterrupted possession by rival claimants undermined the appellants&#039; prima facie entitlement. On these grounds equitable considerations and balance of convenience did not favor grant or maintenance of interim relief, leading to restoration of the prior management and restraints on structural changes plus annual audited accounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 379 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465891</link>
      <description>Interim injunction law and equitable discretion govern requests to restore management and possession of school premises; applicants must show a prima facie case, balance of convenience and likelihood of irreparable injury, and exercise utmost good faith. Suppression or misrepresentation of material facts and use of police to effect possession are relevant to discretion, and long uninterrupted possession by rival claimants undermined the appellants&#039; prima facie entitlement. On these grounds equitable considerations and balance of convenience did not favor grant or maintenance of interim relief, leading to restoration of the prior management and restraints on structural changes plus annual audited accounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>