<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>False installation certificate for imported goods found; non-installation led to confiscation u/s111(o) and reduced penalties</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96013</link>
    <description>Failure to satisfy condition (installation/use) of Notification No.92/2004-Cus: tribunal found the installation certificate was false and goods remained uninstalled, establishing non-fulfilment and authorising action under the Customs Act; consequence - confiscation under s.111(o) and liability for penalties upheld. Payment of differential duty before notice: treated as an election to opt out of exemption framework; consequence - duty payment accepted but did not negate liability for misdeclaration. Quantum of monetary sanctions: tribunal exercised mitigating discretion and reduced redemption fine and penalties; consequence - redemption fine reduced from Rs.10,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 and specified penalties on the importer and chartered engineer substantially reduced. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:24:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:24:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>False installation certificate for imported goods found; non-installation led to confiscation u/s111(o) and reduced penalties</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96013</link>
      <description>Failure to satisfy condition (installation/use) of Notification No.92/2004-Cus: tribunal found the installation certificate was false and goods remained uninstalled, establishing non-fulfilment and authorising action under the Customs Act; consequence - confiscation under s.111(o) and liability for penalties upheld. Payment of differential duty before notice: treated as an election to opt out of exemption framework; consequence - duty payment accepted but did not negate liability for misdeclaration. Quantum of monetary sanctions: tribunal exercised mitigating discretion and reduced redemption fine and penalties; consequence - redemption fine reduced from Rs.10,00,000 to Rs.1,00,000 and specified penalties on the importer and chartered engineer substantially reduced. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:24:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>