<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Validity of provisional PMLA attachment of bank funds lacking proof of proceeds of crime; appeal dismissed, interest partly refunded</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96006</link>
    <description>Whether provisional attachment under the PMLA was validly exercised: Court held that attachment requires the property to be &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; and material to show relation to a scheduled offence; absent evidence of criminal activity or that the predicate offence (Section 13 PC) was a scheduled offence at the relevant time, attachment was misplaced - appeal dismissed on merits. Whether recorded concessions/admissions by counsel could be contradicted: factual recital in the impugned order is conclusive and, having not been corrected before the same forum, cannot be reopened in the appeal - therefore such challenge was rejected. Relief modified: refund of interest ordered but 50% of accrued interest directed to AFBCWF. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:12:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Validity of provisional PMLA attachment of bank funds lacking proof of proceeds of crime; appeal dismissed, interest partly refunded</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96006</link>
      <description>Whether provisional attachment under the PMLA was validly exercised: Court held that attachment requires the property to be &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; and material to show relation to a scheduled offence; absent evidence of criminal activity or that the predicate offence (Section 13 PC) was a scheduled offence at the relevant time, attachment was misplaced - appeal dismissed on merits. Whether recorded concessions/admissions by counsel could be contradicted: factual recital in the impugned order is conclusive and, having not been corrected before the same forum, cannot be reopened in the appeal - therefore such challenge was rejected. Relief modified: refund of interest ordered but 50% of accrued interest directed to AFBCWF. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 11:12:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>