<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 643 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784887</link>
    <description>An appeal dismissed as time-barred was challenged on the ground that the ex parte order had been communicated only later, so limitation should run from the date of communication. The High Court found the impugned order prima facie contrary to the cited precedent on computation of limitation from the date of communication, and the ex parte order was set aside with the matter remitted to the appellate authority for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 643 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784887</link>
      <description>An appeal dismissed as time-barred was challenged on the ground that the ex parte order had been communicated only later, so limitation should run from the date of communication. The High Court found the impugned order prima facie contrary to the cited precedent on computation of limitation from the date of communication, and the ex parte order was set aside with the matter remitted to the appellate authority for fresh decision in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>