<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 647 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784891</link>
    <description>Whether hire charges for hourly use of bulldozers constitute a taxable transfer of right to use goods: applying Supreme Court tests (K.P. Mozika; BSNL) the court found absence of essential attributes of &quot;transfer of right to use&quot; - no physical or legal possession, substantial control remained with supplier, machinery operated by supplier&#039;s personnel and contract obligated execution of land-development work. Legal basis: control/possession test and cumulative BSNL attributes. Outcome: the charges are a composite works contract/service, not turnover under Section 5(E) APGST; tax revision dismissed and prior assessment treating receipts as service charges upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 647 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784891</link>
      <description>Whether hire charges for hourly use of bulldozers constitute a taxable transfer of right to use goods: applying Supreme Court tests (K.P. Mozika; BSNL) the court found absence of essential attributes of &quot;transfer of right to use&quot; - no physical or legal possession, substantial control remained with supplier, machinery operated by supplier&#039;s personnel and contract obligated execution of land-development work. Legal basis: control/possession test and cumulative BSNL attributes. Outcome: the charges are a composite works contract/service, not turnover under Section 5(E) APGST; tax revision dismissed and prior assessment treating receipts as service charges upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>