<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 655 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784899</link>
    <description>A party cannot, in an appeal against the same judgment, contradict its own recorded submissions, admissions or concessions; the proper remedy is to seek correction, clarification or review before the court that made the record, and the recorded statements remained binding here. &#039;Proceeds of crime&#039; under the PMLA require property derived or obtained from criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence; money advanced through banking channels under a commercial land-acquisition arrangement, reflected in accounts and found to be a lawful business transaction, did not satisfy that test. In the absence of a proven nexus with criminal activity, the PMLA attachment could not stand, and the attached properties were directed to be released subject to the stated interest apportionment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 655 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784899</link>
      <description>A party cannot, in an appeal against the same judgment, contradict its own recorded submissions, admissions or concessions; the proper remedy is to seek correction, clarification or review before the court that made the record, and the recorded statements remained binding here. &#039;Proceeds of crime&#039; under the PMLA require property derived or obtained from criminal activity relating to a scheduled offence; money advanced through banking channels under a commercial land-acquisition arrangement, reflected in accounts and found to be a lawful business transaction, did not satisfy that test. In the absence of a proven nexus with criminal activity, the PMLA attachment could not stand, and the attached properties were directed to be released subject to the stated interest apportionment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>