<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 658 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784902</link>
    <description>Issue 1 - Condonation of delay in refiling: The Tribunal found sufficient cause for a 60-day delay in refiling and treated the application as determinative of the appeal&#039;s maintainability; accordingly the delay is condoned and the appeal proceeded. Outcome: Delay condoned. Issue 2 - Admissibility and payment of gratuity and PF claims: The Tribunal held that where submitted claim figures for gratuity and provident fund are reflected in the record, they must be treated as fully admitted and protected; language in the record suggesting &quot;claim missing&quot; could not negate admitted amounts. Outcome: The gratuity (and PF) claims as reflected are deemed admitted and ordered to be paid in full; appeal disposed with that clarification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 658 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784902</link>
      <description>Issue 1 - Condonation of delay in refiling: The Tribunal found sufficient cause for a 60-day delay in refiling and treated the application as determinative of the appeal&#039;s maintainability; accordingly the delay is condoned and the appeal proceeded. Outcome: Delay condoned. Issue 2 - Admissibility and payment of gratuity and PF claims: The Tribunal held that where submitted claim figures for gratuity and provident fund are reflected in the record, they must be treated as fully admitted and protected; language in the record suggesting &quot;claim missing&quot; could not negate admitted amounts. Outcome: The gratuity (and PF) claims as reflected are deemed admitted and ordered to be paid in full; appeal disposed with that clarification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>