<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 663 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784907</link>
    <description>The note addresses grant of a waiver of statutory shareholding thresholds to permit initiation of proceedings for alleged oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act. It reasons that applicants, as beneficiaries of a family trust, presented a prima facie case despite holdings below thresholds, and that intra-family disputes and pending civil suits do not bar consideration of a waiver. The tribunal applied an exceptional-circumstances test to justify limited waiver for maintainability so the dispute on merits could be adjudicated, and found no infirmity in the adjudicating authoritys reasoning, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 663 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784907</link>
      <description>The note addresses grant of a waiver of statutory shareholding thresholds to permit initiation of proceedings for alleged oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act. It reasons that applicants, as beneficiaries of a family trust, presented a prima facie case despite holdings below thresholds, and that intra-family disputes and pending civil suits do not bar consideration of a waiver. The tribunal applied an exceptional-circumstances test to justify limited waiver for maintainability so the dispute on merits could be adjudicated, and found no infirmity in the adjudicating authoritys reasoning, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>