<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 677 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784921</link>
    <description>Whether bank cash deposits constituted unexplained cash credits under s.69: ITAT held that the assessee furnished contemporaneous bank statements, cash book and sales register showing deposits broadly matching disclosed turnover, with regular withdrawals used for purchases; AO/Revenue produced no positive material to controvert origin of deposits and remand report contained no adverse finding of fabrication or non-carrying on of business. Given the assessee&#039;s small kirana business and presumptive cover under s.44AD, technical absence of VAT returns/purchase bills did not render the explanation inadmissible. Outcome: addition u/s 69 quashed and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 677 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784921</link>
      <description>Whether bank cash deposits constituted unexplained cash credits under s.69: ITAT held that the assessee furnished contemporaneous bank statements, cash book and sales register showing deposits broadly matching disclosed turnover, with regular withdrawals used for purchases; AO/Revenue produced no positive material to controvert origin of deposits and remand report contained no adverse finding of fabrication or non-carrying on of business. Given the assessee&#039;s small kirana business and presumptive cover under s.44AD, technical absence of VAT returns/purchase bills did not render the explanation inadmissible. Outcome: addition u/s 69 quashed and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>