<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 689 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784933</link>
    <description>ITAT upheld validity of initiation under s.147/notice u/s.148: Range head has concurrent jurisdiction and undated/unsigned reasons were not fatal where accompanying cover letter bore DIN, so the challenge to reopening was dismissed. On deemed dividend u/s.2(22)(e): transactions characterized as ordinary course share-sale/purchase supported by precedent and CBDT Circular, hence addition deleted. On s.14A disallowance: absence of share investments in the proprietor&#039;s balance sheet negated allegation of expenses relating to exempt dividend, so disallowance deleted. On short-term capital loss from property sale: lack of cogent evidence of transfer and indicia of device led ITAT to confirm AO&#039;s addition. On s.41(1) and s.68 additions: AO&#039;s estimates/excessive jurisdiction disapproved and additions deleted. Disallowance of commission and related adjustments remitted to sustain AO&#039;s inquiries where statutory notices were not complied with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 689 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784933</link>
      <description>ITAT upheld validity of initiation under s.147/notice u/s.148: Range head has concurrent jurisdiction and undated/unsigned reasons were not fatal where accompanying cover letter bore DIN, so the challenge to reopening was dismissed. On deemed dividend u/s.2(22)(e): transactions characterized as ordinary course share-sale/purchase supported by precedent and CBDT Circular, hence addition deleted. On s.14A disallowance: absence of share investments in the proprietor&#039;s balance sheet negated allegation of expenses relating to exempt dividend, so disallowance deleted. On short-term capital loss from property sale: lack of cogent evidence of transfer and indicia of device led ITAT to confirm AO&#039;s addition. On s.41(1) and s.68 additions: AO&#039;s estimates/excessive jurisdiction disapproved and additions deleted. Disallowance of commission and related adjustments remitted to sustain AO&#039;s inquiries where statutory notices were not complied with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>