<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 702 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784946</link>
    <description>An order granting bail may be recalled only if it is illegal, perverse, arbitrary, or made without considering relevant factors, while cancellation of bail ordinarily requires supervening misconduct or misuse of liberty. Applying that distinction, the Delhi HC noted that the bail order had considered the accusations, attributed role, custody period, stage of investigation, and collected material. The alleged tax-evasion figure was treated as assumption-based, and the evidence was largely documentary and already in departmental possession. As no material showed absconding, witness influence, tampering with evidence, or non-cooperation, the challenge to bail was not sustainable and the respondent&#039;s liberty remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 702 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784946</link>
      <description>An order granting bail may be recalled only if it is illegal, perverse, arbitrary, or made without considering relevant factors, while cancellation of bail ordinarily requires supervening misconduct or misuse of liberty. Applying that distinction, the Delhi HC noted that the bail order had considered the accusations, attributed role, custody period, stage of investigation, and collected material. The alleged tax-evasion figure was treated as assumption-based, and the evidence was largely documentary and already in departmental possession. As no material showed absconding, witness influence, tampering with evidence, or non-cooperation, the challenge to bail was not sustainable and the respondent&#039;s liberty remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>