https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465874 Where a State law is published in Hindi and an authorised English translation also exists, a true conflict between the two versions is resolved by applying the authoritative English text under Article 348; words appearing only in the Hindi version cannot be read into the English text, and the contrary contention failed. The Court also held that powers delegated by the State Government under the Uttarakhand Panchayat Raj Act extended to action under Section 138(1)(c), because the delegation was not shown to be expressly restricted to suspension under Section 138(4). The challenge to the District Magistrate's exercise of delegated power therefore failed, and the writ appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:56:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465874 Where a State law is published in Hindi and an authorised English translation also exists, a true conflict between the two versions is resolved by applying the authoritative English text under Article 348; words appearing only in the Hindi version cannot be read into the English text, and the contrary contention failed. The Court also held that powers delegated by the State Government under the Uttarakhand Panchayat Raj Act extended to action under Section 138(1)(c), because the delegation was not shown to be expressly restricted to suspension under Section 138(4). The challenge to the District Magistrate's exercise of delegated power therefore failed, and the writ appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465874