https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465875 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a complete code, and Section 5 requires minimal judicial intervention in matters governed by it. Section 16 empowers the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, so a party challenging rejection of a non-arbitrability or jurisdiction plea must ordinarily await the final award and seek recourse under Section 34. Interference under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to exceptional cases, such as patent lack of jurisdiction or clear bad faith. On the stated facts, the tribunal had given reasons for holding the dispute arbitrable, and supervisory interference was unwarranted; the petition was not maintainable. en-us Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:41:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465875 The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is a complete code, and Section 5 requires minimal judicial intervention in matters governed by it. Section 16 empowers the arbitral tribunal to rule on its own jurisdiction, so a party challenging rejection of a non-arbitrability or jurisdiction plea must ordinarily await the final award and seek recourse under Section 34. Interference under Articles 226 and 227 is confined to exceptional cases, such as patent lack of jurisdiction or clear bad faith. On the stated facts, the tribunal had given reasons for holding the dispute arbitrable, and supervisory interference was unwarranted; the petition was not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465875