<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1604 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465880</link>
    <description>Interpretation of the second proviso to section 269SS clarifies that cash loans between persons who both derive agricultural income and have no other income chargeable to tax are excluded from the prohibition on cash borrowings; where an assessees non-agricultural income is below the taxable threshold it is not &quot;chargeable to tax&quot; and the exclusion applies, and unchallenged assertions that lenders lacked taxable income are accepted. Consequently the statutory prohibition in section 269SS did not apply in the case described and the penalty imposed under the companion penalty provision was held unsustainable, allowing the taxpayers appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 15:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1604 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465880</link>
      <description>Interpretation of the second proviso to section 269SS clarifies that cash loans between persons who both derive agricultural income and have no other income chargeable to tax are excluded from the prohibition on cash borrowings; where an assessees non-agricultural income is below the taxable threshold it is not &quot;chargeable to tax&quot; and the exclusion applies, and unchallenged assertions that lenders lacked taxable income are accepted. Consequently the statutory prohibition in section 269SS did not apply in the case described and the penalty imposed under the companion penalty provision was held unsustainable, allowing the taxpayers appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>