<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49343</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming that the Income-tax Officer (ITO) could not initiate fresh proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1942-43. The Tribunal&#039;s final order, which set aside the reassessment of both syar and interest income, was deemed binding. The appeal was dismissed with costs, reinforcing the principle that final judicial decisions cannot be circumvented by subsequent administrative actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49343</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, confirming that the Income-tax Officer (ITO) could not initiate fresh proceedings under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1942-43. The Tribunal&#039;s final order, which set aside the reassessment of both syar and interest income, was deemed binding. The appeal was dismissed with costs, reinforcing the principle that final judicial decisions cannot be circumvented by subsequent administrative actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>