<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (12) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49342</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 3 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, under Entry 86, List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. The Court interpreted &quot;individuals&quot; broadly to include Hindu undivided families (HUFs), affirming Parliament&#039;s competence to levy wealth-tax on HUFs. The appeals challenging the provision&#039;s validity were dismissed with costs, as the Court found no need to consider the applicability of Entry 97 or Article 248.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 08:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (12) TMI 6 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49342</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 3 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, under Entry 86, List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution. The Court interpreted &quot;individuals&quot; broadly to include Hindu undivided families (HUFs), affirming Parliament&#039;s competence to levy wealth-tax on HUFs. The appeals challenging the provision&#039;s validity were dismissed with costs, as the Court found no need to consider the applicability of Entry 97 or Article 248.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>