<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49333</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeals with costs, ruling that the interest paid by the assessee-company was a permissible deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The claim under section 10(2)(iii) was not admissible as there was no capital borrowed, and the court did not find it necessary to consider the claim under section 10(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 12 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49333</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeals with costs, ruling that the interest paid by the assessee-company was a permissible deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The claim under section 10(2)(iii) was not admissible as there was no capital borrowed, and the court did not find it necessary to consider the claim under section 10(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>