<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49332</link>
    <description>Income is taxable on accrual only when the recipient acquires a present, enforceable right to receive it. Partnership profits do not accrue day by day merely because they arise from business receipts; they crystallise when the governing contract or accounting arrangement makes them payable. Under an annual accounting covenant, no partner can demand his share before the agreed accounting date. Where a Hindu undivided family was disrupted and a partition deed took effect, the coparcener became the sole owner of the partnership interest, and the family ceased to have a subsisting right in profits arising on settlement of accounts. The share of profits was therefore not includible in the family&#039;s taxable income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49332</link>
      <description>Income is taxable on accrual only when the recipient acquires a present, enforceable right to receive it. Partnership profits do not accrue day by day merely because they arise from business receipts; they crystallise when the governing contract or accounting arrangement makes them payable. Under an annual accounting covenant, no partner can demand his share before the agreed accounting date. Where a Hindu undivided family was disrupted and a partition deed took effect, the coparcener became the sole owner of the partnership interest, and the family ceased to have a subsisting right in profits arising on settlement of accounts. The share of profits was therefore not includible in the family&#039;s taxable income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>