<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported fabric thickness discrepancy leads contemporaneous imports to fix value at US$1.80/m; duties, confiscation and penalties upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95985</link>
    <description>Whether transaction value must be fixed by contemporaneous imports when declared goods differ in specification; the officer reasonably doubted the invoice value because declared thickness (0.62 mm) differed from measured thickness (0.740.81 mm), and contemporaneous identical imports recorded US$1.80 and US$1.85 per metre, so valuation under Rule 4 was fixed at the lower US$1.80/m and assessable value, differential duty and penalty were re-determined accordingly. Whether mis-declaration justified confiscation, redemption fine and director penalty; import was found mis-declared, the modest redemption fine and director penalty were considered appropriate and those measures were upheld by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:32:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported fabric thickness discrepancy leads contemporaneous imports to fix value at US$1.80/m; duties, confiscation and penalties upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95985</link>
      <description>Whether transaction value must be fixed by contemporaneous imports when declared goods differ in specification; the officer reasonably doubted the invoice value because declared thickness (0.62 mm) differed from measured thickness (0.740.81 mm), and contemporaneous identical imports recorded US$1.80 and US$1.85 per metre, so valuation under Rule 4 was fixed at the lower US$1.80/m and assessable value, differential duty and penalty were re-determined accordingly. Whether mis-declaration justified confiscation, redemption fine and director penalty; import was found mis-declared, the modest redemption fine and director penalty were considered appropriate and those measures were upheld by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 11:32:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>