<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 577 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784821</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on insurance, outdoor catering, health and fitness, housekeeping, and event management services used before April 2011 was treated as admissible, following earlier Tribunal orders in the same appellant&#039;s favour on identical issues and coordinate bench decisions on similar services. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustained and the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 12:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=878001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 577 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784821</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on insurance, outdoor catering, health and fitness, housekeeping, and event management services used before April 2011 was treated as admissible, following earlier Tribunal orders in the same appellant&#039;s favour on identical issues and coordinate bench decisions on similar services. On that basis, the denial of credit was not sustained and the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>