<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (3) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49318</link>
    <description>Partnership is founded on contract, so a firm of two partners dissolves on the death of one partner unless a valid arrangement shows otherwise; the deceased partner&#039;s heirs do not automatically become partners under the original deed or the Partnership Act. Section 31 presupposes an existing partnership and cannot by itself create a continuing firm after dissolution. On the tax facts, the evidence did not establish partnership with the widow or guardians immediately after death, but a later partnership could be inferred once an heir attained majority. For the relevant year, the business was therefore assessable as a firm, not an association of persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2022 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (3) TMI 24 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49318</link>
      <description>Partnership is founded on contract, so a firm of two partners dissolves on the death of one partner unless a valid arrangement shows otherwise; the deceased partner&#039;s heirs do not automatically become partners under the original deed or the Partnership Act. Section 31 presupposes an existing partnership and cannot by itself create a continuing firm after dissolution. On the tax facts, the evidence did not establish partnership with the widow or guardians immediately after death, but a later partnership could be inferred once an heir attained majority. For the relevant year, the business was therefore assessable as a firm, not an association of persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>