<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (4) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49316</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the firm, upholding its entitlement to registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act. It determined that the partnership deed only granted benefits to minors without conferring full partnership status. The court emphasized the guardian&#039;s role in accepting benefits on behalf of minors and highlighted the need for adherence to legal provisions concerning minors&#039; rights in partnerships. The supplementary deed for extending the partnership did not impact the decision, as the main partnership deed already clarified the nature of minors&#039; involvement. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the firm&#039;s right to registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (4) TMI 18 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49316</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the firm, upholding its entitlement to registration under section 26A of the Income-tax Act. It determined that the partnership deed only granted benefits to minors without conferring full partnership status. The court emphasized the guardian&#039;s role in accepting benefits on behalf of minors and highlighted the need for adherence to legal provisions concerning minors&#039; rights in partnerships. The supplementary deed for extending the partnership did not impact the decision, as the main partnership deed already clarified the nature of minors&#039; involvement. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the firm&#039;s right to registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49316</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>