<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (4) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49315</link>
    <description>Court addressed whether dividends from 300 shares transferred to a trust were taxable as the settlor&#039;s income under the deeming provisions for settlements. Applying the proviso&#039;s test, the deed was held irrevocable and contained no provision for retransfer of income or assets to the settlor nor any right for the settlor to reassume control; incidental indirect benefit from discharge of settlor&#039;s obligations did not amount to a statutory retransfer or reassumption. Consequently the income was not attributable to the settlor and was not assessable as his income; revenue appeals were dismissed and the trust-treated dividends remained outside the settlor&#039;s tax net.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 09:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87795" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (4) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49315</link>
      <description>Court addressed whether dividends from 300 shares transferred to a trust were taxable as the settlor&#039;s income under the deeming provisions for settlements. Applying the proviso&#039;s test, the deed was held irrevocable and contained no provision for retransfer of income or assets to the settlor nor any right for the settlor to reassume control; incidental indirect benefit from discharge of settlor&#039;s obligations did not amount to a statutory retransfer or reassumption. Consequently the income was not attributable to the settlor and was not assessable as his income; revenue appeals were dismissed and the trust-treated dividends remained outside the settlor&#039;s tax net.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>