https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784807 An unregistered agreement of sale does not convey title to immovable property, and inconsistencies in the relied-upon documents further weakened the claimed transaction. Protection against dispossession under Article 226 also required proof of actual and physical possession, which was not established on the materials, as interim orders in prior proceedings were insufficient for that purpose. Where the land had already been subject to prior statutory vesting and earlier land ceiling proceedings, the asserted title and possession were treated as prima facie doubtful, making extraordinary writ relief unsustainable. The writ protection was therefore denied and the appellants' position restored. en-us Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784807 An unregistered agreement of sale does not convey title to immovable property, and inconsistencies in the relied-upon documents further weakened the claimed transaction. Protection against dispossession under Article 226 also required proof of actual and physical possession, which was not established on the materials, as interim orders in prior proceedings were insufficient for that purpose. Where the land had already been subject to prior statutory vesting and earlier land ceiling proceedings, the asserted title and possession were treated as prima facie doubtful, making extraordinary writ relief unsustainable. The writ protection was therefore denied and the appellants' position restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784807