<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 564 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784808</link>
    <description>Separate dishonoured cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can generate distinct causes of action when each cheque is presented, dishonoured, and followed by statutory notice independently. The Supreme Court held that quashing under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not meant for resolving disputed questions such as whether cheques were alternative securities or whether liability subsisted, because those issues require evidence at trial. On that basis, the complaint earlier quashed was restored, while the challenge to the other complaints failed and those matters were left for trial on evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 564 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784808</link>
      <description>Separate dishonoured cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act can generate distinct causes of action when each cheque is presented, dishonoured, and followed by statutory notice independently. The Supreme Court held that quashing under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not meant for resolving disputed questions such as whether cheques were alternative securities or whether liability subsisted, because those issues require evidence at trial. On that basis, the complaint earlier quashed was restored, while the challenge to the other complaints failed and those matters were left for trial on evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>