<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unpaid supply of 346 units held operational debt; default established and Section 9/CIRP admission upheld after no bona fide dispute</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95978</link>
    <description>Whether operational debt and default existed: the tribunal found invoices for supply of 346 units undisputedly delivered, partial payments accepted without quality/quantity or pricing objections, and an outstanding unpaid balance of â‚¬1,28,204.70 - therefore default on an operational debt that was due and payable was established. Whether pre-existing disputes barred Section 9 relief: the alleged exclusivity agreement involved a different legal entity, the injunction suit concerned distinct subject-matter and was not raised in the demand notice, and the asserted disputes were held frivolous - consequently no bona fide pre-existing dispute existed and admission under Section 9/CIRP initiation was valid. - NCLAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unpaid supply of 346 units held operational debt; default established and Section 9/CIRP admission upheld after no bona fide dispute</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95978</link>
      <description>Whether operational debt and default existed: the tribunal found invoices for supply of 346 units undisputedly delivered, partial payments accepted without quality/quantity or pricing objections, and an outstanding unpaid balance of â‚¬1,28,204.70 - therefore default on an operational debt that was due and payable was established. Whether pre-existing disputes barred Section 9 relief: the alleged exclusivity agreement involved a different legal entity, the injunction suit concerned distinct subject-matter and was not raised in the demand notice, and the asserted disputes were held frivolous - consequently no bona fide pre-existing dispute existed and admission under Section 9/CIRP initiation was valid. - NCLAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>