<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refilling gas into customer-supplied cylinders found not &quot;manufacture&quot; under deeming provision; excise demand set aside</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95976</link>
    <description>Whether refilling/bottling gas into customer-supplied cylinders constitutes &quot;manufacture&quot; for excise: the tribunal analyzed the chapter-note deeming provision that broadens &quot;manufacture&quot; to include activities altering goods&#039; delivery form without changing characteristics, concluding such deeming aims to tax autonomous, independent activities carried out within the factory; however, on the facts the act of filling into customer containers was held akin to providing transport/removal occurring after production and not a taxable manufacture. Consequence: the excise demand was without authority and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=877921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refilling gas into customer-supplied cylinders found not &quot;manufacture&quot; under deeming provision; excise demand set aside</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95976</link>
      <description>Whether refilling/bottling gas into customer-supplied cylinders constitutes &quot;manufacture&quot; for excise: the tribunal analyzed the chapter-note deeming provision that broadens &quot;manufacture&quot; to include activities altering goods&#039; delivery form without changing characteristics, concluding such deeming aims to tax autonomous, independent activities carried out within the factory; however, on the facts the act of filling into customer containers was held akin to providing transport/removal occurring after production and not a taxable manufacture. Consequence: the excise demand was without authority and the appeal was allowed. - CESTAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 08:29:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>