<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49296</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the valuation of assets as per the balance-sheet for Wealth-tax purposes, rejected the deductibility of proposed dividend in computing net wealth, and allowed the provision for income-tax and super-tax as a debt owed. The separate judgment disagreed on the tax liability timing, but the majority decision prevailed. The High Court&#039;s order was modified accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 19:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49296</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the valuation of assets as per the balance-sheet for Wealth-tax purposes, rejected the deductibility of proposed dividend in computing net wealth, and allowed the provision for income-tax and super-tax as a debt owed. The separate judgment disagreed on the tax liability timing, but the majority decision prevailed. The High Court&#039;s order was modified accordingly, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>