<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49294</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the guardians should be taxed on the separate income of each minor, as they received the shares of the minors in the profit of the business individually. The court concluded that section 40 of the Act applied, requiring the assessment of the guardians treating the minors as constituting a Hindu undivided family. The appeal was allowed, and the court directed the appellant to receive costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49294</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the guardians should be taxed on the separate income of each minor, as they received the shares of the minors in the profit of the business individually. The court concluded that section 40 of the Act applied, requiring the assessment of the guardians treating the minors as constituting a Hindu undivided family. The appeal was allowed, and the court directed the appellant to receive costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>