<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (11) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49291</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the post office acted as the agent of the assessee for receiving cheques, making the sale proceeds taxable in British India. Additionally, the revenue authorities were allowed to raise new contentions in the High Court. As a result, the appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 08:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (11) TMI 36 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49291</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the post office acted as the agent of the assessee for receiving cheques, making the sale proceeds taxable in British India. Additionally, the revenue authorities were allowed to raise new contentions in the High Court. As a result, the appeals were dismissed with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>